Natural mating versus artificial insemination on reproductive performance of cattle in Zimbabwe’s smallholder sector: A review

Authors

  • Recent Dzivakwi Rashidi Ministry of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development (AGRITEX Makonde District, Mashonaland Province, Zimbabwe)
  • Stanley Marshall Makuza Department of Animal Production and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi,
  • Chrispen Murungweni Department of Animal Production and Technology, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe

Keywords:

Breeding, Inbreeding, Livestock, Reproductivity, Smallholder

Abstract

Effects of the natural mating and the artificial insemination breeding methods were reviewed.
Breeding methods have significant impact on cattle reproductive performance in the
smallholder sector livestock production sector. In Zimbabwe, over 80% of cattle population is
found in the smallholder sector. Cattle production in smallholder sector is characterised by poor
reproductive performance due to several reasons, among them the breeding method. A
comprehensive systematic literature review search was conducted from August 2021 to July
2022 using search engines Google Scholar and EBSCO host to explore the impacts of different
breeding methods used in smallholder sector of Zimbabwe. Fifty-seven full text articles met
the inclusion criteria. Forty-one of the articles were research papers and sixteen were narrative
reviews. The most common breeding method, the natural mating method, is easier for farmers
but badly affected by communal system of grazing and limited number and diversity of bulls available. The alternative artificial insemination method is used by limited number of farmers due to lack of knowledge, skill and resources. Both methods of mating explored have their own advantages and disadvantages. The central problem to using the natural mating method is inbreeding. Inbreeding leads to a multitude of other problems all leading to poor reproductive performance. It was concluded that systematic revealing of problems and sequential chronicling of advantages can help farmers understand each of the two methods for better
implementation and decision making on each method.

References

Abebe, A. (2012). Smallholder farms livestock management practices and their implications on livestock water productivity in mixed crop-livestock systems in the highlands of Blue Nile basin: A case study from fogera, diga and jeldu districts (Ethiopia). Hawassa University.

Atukunda, P., Eide, W. B., Kardel, K. R., Iversen, P. O., & Westerberg, A. C. (2021). Unlocking the potential for achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2–‘Zero Hunger’–in Africa: targets, strategies, synergies and challenges. Food & Nutrition Research, 65.

Braker, M., & Udo, H. (2002). The role of livestock in subsistence farming systems in South Africa and the implications for development. Paper presented at the Book of Abstracts of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Cairo, 2002.-[Sl]:[sn], 2002.-poster CMS1. 16.

Chinsembu, K., Negumbo, J., Likando, M., & Mbangu, A. (2014). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used to treat livestock diseases in Onayena and Katima Mulilo, Namibia. South African Journal of Botany, 94, 101-107.

Cletos, M., Michael, C., Voster, M., Kennedy, D., Munyaradzi, C. M., & Jan, G. R. (2007). Potential for value-addition of Nguni cattle products in the communal areas of South Africa: a review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(10), 488-495.

Coetzee, L., Montshwe, B., & Jooste, A. (2005). The marketing of livestock on communal lands in the Eastern Cape Province: contraints, challenges and implications for the extension services. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 34(1), 81-103.

Diskin, M., & Kenny, D. (2016). Managing the reproductive performance of beef cows. Theriogenology, 86(1), 379-387.

Duguma, B., & Janssens, G. P. (2021). Assessment of livestock feed resources and coping strategies with dry season feed scarcity in mixed crop–livestock farming systems around the gilgel gibe catchment, Southwest Ethiopia. Sustainability, 13(19), 10713.

Escarcha, J. F., Lassa, J. A., & Zander, K. K. (2018). Livestock under climate change: a systematic review of impacts and adaptation. Climate, 6(3), 54.

Geber, M. A., & Griffen, L. R. (2003). Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. International journal of plant sciences, 164(S3), S21-S42.

Getahun, D., Alemneh, T., Akeberegn, D., Getabalew, M., & Zewdie, D. (2019). Importance of hybrid vigor or heterosis for animal breeding. Biochemistry and Biotechnology Research, 7(1), 1-4.

Greyling, J. C. (2012). The role of the agricultural sector in the South African economy. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

Gwaza, D., & Yahaya, A. Effect of interaction between economic driving force, value chain intervention, communal crisis and uncontrolled breeding on genetic resource abundance of the Nigerian savannah muturu cattle. J Res Rep Genet. 2018; 2 (2): 29-37 J Res Rep Genet 2018 Volume 2 Issue, 3.

Gwaze, F. R., Chimonyo, M., & Dzama, K. (2009). Prevalence and loads of gastrointestinal parasites of goats in the communal areas of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Small Ruminant Research, 84(1-3), 132-134.

Habanabakize, E., Ba, K., Corniaux, C., Cortbaoui, P., & Vasseur, E. (2022). A typology of smallholder livestock production systems reflecting the impact of the development of a local milk collection industry: Case study of Fatick region, Senegal. Pastoralism, 12(1), 1-14.

Hasler, J. F. (2004). Embryo transfer in farm animals. Encyclopedia of Animal Science (Print), 329. Hoffecker, L. (2020). Grey Literature Searching for Systematic Reviews in the Health Sciences. The Serials Librarian, 79(3-4), 252-260.

Honeychurch, W., & Makarewicz, C. A. (2016). The archaeology of pastoral nomadism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 341-359.

Jera, R., & Ajayi, O. C. (2008). Logistic modelling of smallholder livestock farmers' adoption of tree based fodder technology in Zimbabwe. Agrekon, 47(3), 379-392.

Khainga, D. N. (2015). Adoption of assisted reproductive technologies and Sahiwal cattle breed and their impact on household farm income in Narok and Kajiado counties of Kenya. Egerton University.

Lawrence, F., Mutembei, H., Lagat, J., Mburu, J., Amimo, J., & Okeyo, A. (2015). Constraints to use of breeding services in Kenya.

Mabhena, C. (2013). Knowledge and power in a pastoral landscape: Agrarian struggles in Southern Matabeleland. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(2), 27-35.

Mabhena, C. (2014). Livestock livelihoods compromised: The dilemma of the Fast Track Land Reform and Resettlement Programme in Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 32(1), 100-117.

Mapiye, C., Chikwanha, O. C., Chimonyo, M., & Dzama, K. (2019). Strategies for sustainable use of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa. Diversity, 11(11), 214.

Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., & Dzama, K. (2009). Seasonal dynamics, production potential and efficiency of cattle in the sweet and sour communal rangelands in South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments, 73(4-5), 529-536.

Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., Dzama, K., Raats, J., & Mapekula, M. (2009). Opportunities for improving Nguni cattle production in the smallholder farming systems of South Africa. Livestock science, 124(1-3), 196-204.

Marshall, F., & Hildebrand, E. (2002). Cattle before crops: the beginnings of food production in Africa. Journal of World prehistory, 16(2), 99-143.

Marshall, K. (2014). Optimizing the use of breed types in developing country livestock production systems: a neglected research area. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 131(5), 329 340.

Mavedzenge, B. Z., Mahenehene, J., Murimbarimba, F., Scoones, I., Wolmer, W., & Hotel, C. (2006). Changes in the livestock sector in Zimbabwe following land reform: the case of Masvingo province. Institute for Development Studies, Brighton, available from: http://www. ids. ac. uk/index. cfm.

McDermott, J. J., Staal, S. J., Freeman, H. A., Herrero, M., & Van de Steeg, J. (2010). Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livestock science, 130(1-3), 95 109.

Meissner, H., Scholtz, M., & Engelbrecht, F. (2013). Sustainability of the South African Livestock Sector towards 2050 Part 2: Challenges, changes and required implementations. South African Journal of Animal Science, 43(3), 289-319.

Miller, S. (2010). Genetic improvement of beef cattle through opportunities in genomics. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 39, 247-255.

Mishra, S. P., Taraphder, S., Roy, M., Sarkar, U., Datta, S., Saikhom, R., . . . Mohanty, D. (2017). Breeding techniques to exploit non-additive gene action for improvement of Livestock. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci, 6, 126-134.

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., . . . Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews, 4(1), 1-9.

Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (2015). Land Occupations and Land Reform in Zimbabwe: Toward the National Democratic Revolution Global Capitalism and the Future of Agrarian Society (pp. 229-262): Routledge.

Mpofu, N. (2002). Comparison of indigenous and foreign cattle for beef production at Matopos Research Station in Zimbabwe. AGTR Case Study.

Mthi, S., Rust, J., & Morgenthal, T. (2016). Partial nutritional evaluation of some browser plant species utilized by communal livestock in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Applied Animal Husbandry & Rural Development, 9(1), 25-30.

Mujere, J., & Dombo, S. (2011). Large scale investment projects and land grabs in Zimbabwe: the case of Nuanetsi Ranch Bio-Diesel Project. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing.

Musemwa, L., Mushunje, A., Chimonyo, M., & Mapiye, C. (2010). Low cattle market off-take rates in communal production systems of South Africa: Causes and mitigation strategies. Journal of sustainable development in Africa, 12(5), 209-226.

Mutibvu, T., Maburutse, B., Mbiriri, D., & Kashangura, M. (2012). Constraints and opportunities for increased livestock production in communal areas: A case study of Simbe, Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 24(9), 165.

Mwai, O., Hanotte, O., Kwon, Y.-J., & Cho, S. (2015). African indigenous cattle: unique genetic resources in a rapidly changing world. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 28(7), 911.

Ndebele, J., Muchenje, V., Mapiye, C., Chimonyo, M., Musemwa, L., & Ndlovu, T. (2007). Cattle breeding management practices in the Gwayi smallholder farming area of South-Western Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19(11).

Nijamudeen, S. S. (2020). A Study of Awareness on Artificial Insemination among Medical College Students. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(3).

Nyamushamba, G., Mapiye, C., Tada, O., Halimani, T., & Muchenje, V. (2017). Conservation of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa’s smallholder areas: turning threats into opportunities-A review.

Odero-Waitituh, J. (2017). Smallholder dairy production in Kenya; a review. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 29(7), 139.

Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 43.

Paim, T. d. P., Hay, E., Wilson, C., Thomas, M., Kuehn, L., Paiva, S., . . . Blackburn, H. (2020). Dynamics of genomic architecture during composite breed development in cattle. Animal genetics, 51(2), 224-234.

Pareek, A., Singh, A., Kumar, M., Kushwaha, H. R., Lynn, A. M., & Singla-Pareek, S. L. (2006). Whole genome analysis of Oryza sativa reveals similar architecture of two-component signaling machinery with Arabidopsis. Plant physiology, 142(2), 380-397.

Perry, G. (2005). Factors affecting breeding success. Paper presented at the Range Beef Cow Symposium.

Philipsson, J., Rege, J., & Okeyo Mwai, A. (2011). Sustainable breeding programmes for tropical farming systems. AGTR Version 2 Training Module.

Phillips, P. E., & Jahnke, M. M. (2016). Embryo transfer (techniques, donors, and recipients). Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice, 32(2), 365-385.

Selk, G. (2002). Embryo transfer in cattle. Retrieved from Shanahan, M. (2012). The brain's connective core and its role in animal cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2704 2714. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0128

Shiimi, T., Taljaard, P. R., & Jordaan, H. (2012). Transaction costs and cattle farmers' choice of marketing channel in North-Central Namibia. Agrekon, 51(1), 42-58.

Tavirimirwa, B., Mwembe, R., Ngulube, B., Banana, N., Nyamushamba, G., Ncube, S., & Nkomboni, D. (2013). Communal cattle production in Zimbabwe: A. Development, 25, 12.

Tembachako, D. S., Ndlovu, P., & Mukomana, S. (2015). Challenges and Opportunities on Beef Cattle Marketing and off Take Rates in Zimbabwe’s Small Holder Farming Sector: A Case of A1 Resettlement Farmers in Umzingwane District of Matabeleland South Province.

Thornton, P., & Herrero, M. (2010). The inter-linkages between rapid growth in livestock production, climate change, and the impacts on water resources, land use, and deforestation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper(5178).

Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2853-2867.

Vanvanhossou, S. F. U., Dossa, L. H., & König, S. (2021). Sustainable Management of Animal Genetic Resources to Improve Low-Input Livestock Production: Insights into Local Beninese Cattle Populations. Sustainability, 13(17), 9874.

Wakchaure, R., Ganguly, S., Praveen, P. K., Sharma, S., Kumar, A., Mahajan, T., & Qadri, K. (2015). Importance of heterosis in animals: a review. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Innovative Science, 1(2), 1-5.

Washaya, S., Tavirimirwa, B., Dube, S., Sisito, G., Tambo, G., Ncube, S., & Zhakata, X. (2019). Reproductive efficiency in naturally serviced and artificially inseminated beef cows. Tropical animal health and production, 51, 1963-1968.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Dzivakwi Rashidi, R., Makuza, S. M., & Murungweni, C. (2024). Natural mating versus artificial insemination on reproductive performance of cattle in Zimbabwe’s smallholder sector: A review. Journal of Technological Sciences, 1(2), 15–32. Retrieved from https://journals.cut.ac.zw/index.php/jts/article/view/94