Bridging Sustainability Gap: Opportunities and Barriers for Green Public-Private Partnerships in Zimbabwe
Keywords:
Green public-private partnerships, Energy, Opportunities, Barriers, ZimbabweAbstract
Green Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are gaining traction as collaborative mechanisms for advancing sustainable energy goals in developing economies. In Zimbabwe, however, the institutional environment poses both opportunities and constraints to the effective implementation. This study investigates how the regulative, normative, and cognitive pillars of Zimbabwe’s institutional landscape influence the development of green PPPs in the energy sector, using Institutional Theory as an analytical lens. A structured survey was administered to 120 purposively selected stakeholders from government agencies, private energy firms, NGOs, and donor organizations in Harare Metropolitan Province. The survey employed a 5-point Likert scale to assess stakeholder perceptions across institutional dimensions. Findings reveal that while there is strong conceptual support for green PPPs, challenges such as weak regulatory enforcement, inter-sectoral mistrust, and a lack of shared sustainability values continue to hinder collaboration. Prior experience with PPPs was identified as a key factor influencing stakeholder readiness to engage. The study recommends policy interventions aimed at fostering trust, aligning institutional norms, and strengthening the regulatory framework to support sustainable energy partnerships.
References
Bryant, J. (2025). Sustainable energy in Zimbabwe – Status, challenges and solutions towards a greener energy future [Presentation]. European Future Energy Forum (3rd Forum), January 16, 2025.
DiMaggio, P. J., and Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
DLA Piper. (2022). Africa energy futures: Zimbabwe. In Africa Energy Futures. DLA Piper. Retrieved from DLA Piper: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2022/11/africa-energy-futures/africa-energy-futures-zimbabwe
Dube, L., and Makumbe, P. (2022). National Renewable Energy Policy (NREP) 2019: Scaling up renewables and stimulating private-sector participation in Zimbabwe’s electricity sector. In Alternative Energy & Power 2022: Zimbabwe (1–4). Chambers & Partners. Retrieved from ICLG: Renewable Energy Laws and Regulations 2025 – Zimbabwe
Gandidzanwa, C. P., Togo, M and Mawonde, A., (2023). Water–energy network provisioning services in Harare, Zimbabwe. Water Supply, 24(5), 1958–1972.
International Energy Agency. (2020). Climate Impacts on African Hydropower (61 pp.). IEA / OECD Publishing.
Matiashe, F. S. (2025). Zimbabwe’s power struggle pits survival against sustainability. FairPlanet. https://www.fairplanet.org/story/zimbabwes-power-struggle-pits-survival-against-sustainability/
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Minister of Energy and Power Development. (2019). Zimbabwe National Renewable Energy Policy. Government of Zimbabwe. Retrieved from African Power Platform: https://www.africanpowerplatform.org/resources/reports/east-africa/zimbabwe/1961-zimbabwe-national-renewable-energy-policy-2019.html
Moyo, T., and Mutasa, C. (2020). Climate Change and Energy in Zimbabwe: Towards a low-carbon energy industry. In Climate Change Law in Zimbabwe: Concepts and Insights (234–235). ResearchGate.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808678
Scott, W.R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2nd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, 21-22.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., and Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sylvester Marumahoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.